 |
“Us and Them” As we approach our ninetieth birthday, we should reflect on
why the SFAA is unique and distinct from the other “property rights” groups
in our community. Indeed, we are not alone: Both in the City as well as
the region, there are competing landlord organizations and apartment
associations striving for your membership. The SFAA can neither ignore, nor
disregard, the fact that it must share the pond with other fishes. Thus,
the inevitable question posed on the eve of this celebration is what makes
us unique from these other apartment associations, and are we the most
deserving of your membership dollar?
Some will argue that the SFAA is not aggressive enough in the effort to
strengthen and restore property rights. This contingency claims that a
better SFAA would be unyielding in its position, seeking absolute
abolishment of rent control without any serious recognition of the enormous
and powerful tenant lobby in both our local and state electorates. To them,
the war is a simple “black and white” battleground.
While I can understand the genesis this viewpoint given the ongoing
erosion of basic property rights, I could not disagree more with those who
advocate for such a hard line political stance. Rather, I see SFAA’s
primary strength as its ability to craft compromises and settlements in
order to avoid catastrophic legislation and rulings. If anyone believes
that the environment cannot worsen for us, please think again. Many never
see, or conveniently ignore, the “proposed” or “almost passed” laws, and
instead choose to focus on the end result. Consequently, these critics
attribute any pro-tenant bill to an inability to succeed at City Hall or at
the Capitol. Such presumptions belie reality.
What should be lauded is SFAA’s ongoing ability to work with almost every
Supervisor, and to garner the respect of just about everyone at City Hall.
This hard-earned respect translates into the local government’s willingness
to incorporate the housing industry’s most important needs into an otherwise
overly hostile and anti-ownership climate. In the absence of such
cooperation, the results would truly be dire: erosion of Costa-Hawkins,
imposition of the elected Rent Board, elimination of capital pass-throughs,
and heightened penalties for code violations are just a few examples of what
skillful politicking has managed to avert during the past few years.
So to those who say we should declare war on 100 Van Ness Avenue, I say
phooey. With the voters aligned against us, such tact is tantamount to
suicide. When you are in the minority, the focus must lie in fostering
relationships with those in power, not attacking them. The later, for sure,
would easily ensure that our pro-tenant adversaries will lock down this
industry in such a manner that we would long for the glory days of 2007.
There is also the fact that we are a nonprofit organization. This is
significant because every dollar you spend goes directly to what matters
most: rental housing education classes, development of forms, a better
presence at City Hall, and litigation to dissipate unconstitutional
legislation. No person or groups profit from the SFAA. To the contrary,
many of us contribute endless hours of our day to the betterment of this
organization, which ultimately translates to the improvement of the
industry’s standing in the community. The staff is paid modestly, as I can
truly report that their skill set, coupled with the genuine effort they
tirelessly put forward each and every day, would pay them more in the
for-profit sectors of our economy. From the Executive Director on down, the
people you have working for you are, without doubt, first class and of
admirable character. Most importantly, their enthusiasm for their work is
second-to-none, and even in the face of defeat they eagerly embark upon the
next challenge. The second blessing comes from our volunteers. Every
month, you can attend the educational classes, priced modestly so as to
cover the cost of the room rental, taught by leaders in the industry. For
example, you can learn property management and landlording skills from
professionals who exact a premium for their services. Incredibly, these
eager volunteers are just that: they give without charge month after month
after month. At every general membership meeting, attorneys who command
hourly rates well over $300 answer your questions for free. The annual
trade show brings in substantial vendors, eager to help you navigate the
rough seas of the industry. No one but you really profits from these
efforts.
In the end, you must choose where you want to devote your time and
financial resources. You should, in essence, judge the SFAA and decide
whether or not its structure comports with how you believe the industry
should be positioning itself. Unquestionably, we can rightfully conclude
that the ongoing assault against our rights remains unabated. To this end,
every year brings another law or court decision that smacks of an unjust
taking. Yet how we respond to this reality will determine tomorrow’s
success or failure. If we wage an all-out assault against our foes, do we
undermine our own effectiveness and relevancy? Or, as suggested above, is
the better avenue towards an even playing field defined by ongoing efforts
to educate the adversary while, at the same time, build a political base
that is able to successfully advance the industry’s agenda in a town
comprised mostly of tenants? To do the later, I submit that negotiating,
effective long-term coalition building, and skillful lobbying will trump the
overly aggressive stance some of the other apartment association
organizations have employed over the past decade.
In sum, the temptation to resort to strong arm tactics is overwhelming in
the wake of the ongoing assaults we are confronted with year after year.
The ability to show restraint, coupled with well-planned strategy, is what
separates ineffective from effective organizations. You, as the consumer,
need to decide what methodology better serves your interest. In closing,
I would like to acknowledge our industry partners who truly compliment the
efforts of SFAA. Without their participation, many, if not most, of our
successes could not have been attained. First, the Greater San Francisco
Association of Realtors should be lauded for its efforts aimed at stemming
abusive legislation and erroneous court decisions. The GSFAR, comprised of
San Francisco Realtors, has always participated in the housing industry’s
political and legislative battles. No one can seriously argue that the
purchase and sale of highly valued San Francisco real estate would halt even
with the passage of the most extreme forms of rent control, so the Realtors’
partnership with us is truly genuine and not merely motivated by profit.
Second, we should be thankful to the Coalition for Better Housing, or
CBH. This non-profit group consists mainly of large apartment building
owners, managers, and developers. CBH’s ability to raise funds for
elections and legislative battles is unparalleled. To this end, very few
politicians run for major office without first testing their candidacy with
CBH.
Third, for those in the property management industry, the Professional
Property Managers Association, or PPMA, has been a fixture in the City for
25 years. Each month, property managers can inform themselves of the latest
in laws, know-how, and tools of the trade at the PPMA lunch meetings. Like
the Realtors and CBH, PPMA fights alongside with us at every election and
throughout the year. With your SFAA membership, you also become members of
the California Apartment Association, or CAA. Once a minor player in
Sacramento affairs, CAA today is one of the most important lobbying
organizations in the State. As the property rights battle shifts more and
more from local debate to statewide showdowns, CAA’s muscles will become
increasingly beneficial. Not surprisingly, almost every major urban area in
California has a CAA-affiliated apartment association, and SFAA is proud to
be a part of this impressive alliance.
So the next time you receive a solicitation in the mail or on-line, think
about where your efforts will be best placed. We all would relish the day
that these onerous restrictions dissipate, yet the realistic achievement of
this objective will be attained only with the right strategy and planning.
Stated succinctly, long term victory will not be accomplished by the short
term aggression some of our competitors claim we should embrace. SFAA, and
its industry partners, consistently display the requisite restraint and
skillful politicking, and, while only time will tell for certain, this is
the road I submit will lead us to where we need to be.
DW |