|
SFAA PRESIDENT’S REPORT -- March 2007
Your SFAA Board of
Directors attended the annual California Apartment Association Board of
Directors’ & Committee meetings at the end of January in Costa Mesa.
As many of you know, CAA consists of 19 local organizations (affiliates and
chapters) representing distinct regions of apartment owners in our state.
SFAA is unique in that, geographically, our district is the smallest in
terms of square miles. Yet apparent from these meetings is the fact
that our miniscule slice of the state creates the most intense and daunting
political battles. Indeed, the Los Angeles CAA chapter hardly ever
encounters the gross hostility that we contend with on a regular basis here
at home.
In the midst of this
reality comes a sobering and embarrassing fact discussed at length during
this year’s CAA membership committee meeting: That SFAA represents
less than ten percent of the market in San Francisco, meaning that
ninety-plus percent of all apartment owners and operators in the City are
not members. No wonder City Hall balks at our demands!
Many of the other
apartment association heads bragged that their organizations command more
than 60% market penetration. Ironically, such eager enrollment occurs
in areas like Orange County, San Diego and Sacramento where rent control
remains someone else’s nightmare. Here at ground zero, the troops seem
content to relegate active participation to the few, and sadly the vast
majority of us cannot even muster the will to pay modest membership fees so
as to enable this organization to fight the war.
Why? Is it because
most have given up? Or are we just content with the pervasive erosion
of our rights as owners? Everyday, I hear someone tell me that you
have to be crazy to own rental property in the City. Yet ask your
local real estate salesperson about available inventory, and they will tell
you that prices keep going up, and that supply cannot withstand ever
increasing demand. Obviously, someone recognizes that housing is our
scarcest and most valuable commodity.
This organization’s
regular apartment owner membership stands at about 2,600. As discussed
above, this number represents less than 10% of San Francisco’s landlord
population. SFAA annually spends considerable time and funding on
advertisement and new member outreach. Such exposure only goes so far,
and perhaps cannot go any farther.
Therefore, what I need
from each of you is a sincere commitment to recruit at least one new member
this year. This is an easy task, and the results will more than double
our membership. The increase in revenue will translate into better
representation in state and local government, which in turn will improve our
ability to stop the onslaught.
If you cannot make this
promise, then please do not complain about the further horrors that will
inevitably confront us this year. Do not express frustration at the
membership meetings. Refrain from writing the Chronicle’s editorial
department. In sum, be glad with what you have, and with what you will
lose in years to come.
Obviously, no one in the
ownership community is pleased with the status quo. The national
consultant, hired by CAA to increase membership in all CAA affiliates and
chapters, confirms what most of us already know to be true: That new
recruits come quickest and easiest from referrals and word-of-mouth, not
newspaper ads. So please, I urge each of you to take this pledge
seriously.
At the CAA meeting, each
affiliate and chapter promised to substantially increase its membership over
the next year. In fact, our Board will be undergoing serious
introspection as to how each Board member shall bear personal responsibility
for this shortfall. As the leading representative body for apartment
owners in the City, we cannot act effectively when the vast majority of the
constituency sits on the sidelines. So let’s change this reality now,
and begin recruitment by contacting an owner you know to have either
relinquished membership or to never have joined our organization. I
thank you for making this pledge.
DW
|
 |